A false flag conspiracy about the Orlando shooting held that Google News carried word of the incident several hours before it actually took place.
Claims that the Google Search engine picked up the story from Atlanta Sun times before the shooting actually occurred.1 like
ORIGIN:In the chaotic aftermath of the 12 June 2016 Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting, a number ofrumors and inaccuracies swept across social media. Among them was the claim that a new syndicate including the Atlanta Sun Times (not the Chicago Sun-Times) had reported news of the massacre several hours "too early":
Google Search Engine Picked-Up ORLANDO ATTACK NEWS STORY 6 Hours BEFORE attack took place!
The Google news search engine picked-up an Sun Times Network article about the attack at an Orlando nightclub 6 hours BEFORE the attack took place! The attack occurred around 2:00 AM eastern US time on Sunday, June 12.
But the Atlanta Sun-Times Network has the following story about the attack, dated 06/11/2016, 08:00PM (Double Click Image to enlarge):
The item went on to claim that Google had also displayed the timestamp:
Google's news system is totally automated. It checks thousands of news sites dozens of times a day automatically, and creates a link within Google to news articles, then applies a Google time stamp when the story is acquired by Google (not when the story shows it was published). Google's news system shows that Google picked-up that story BEFORE the attack took place!
As the post indicated, Google automatically populates information from web sites, so it holds that ifAtlanta Sun Times incorrectly dated the page, Google would also display that incorrect information. We checked the source code of the page and indeed, the item was listed as published several hours prior to the attack — in one portion of the code:
However, that wasn't universally true. While the aggregation of the Atlanta Sun Times' report was incorrectly timestamped, the original content was clearly not:
The mismatch in timestamps suggested a technical error of some sort, so we contacted the Atlanta Sun Times to ask whether the variation was a glitch or something else. An employee explained to us how the aggregated article (since corrected) ended up misdated:
My apologies for the delay in getting back to you. I wanted to dig into this and get you an accurate answer on the timestamp error. Here's what I discovered:
As you pointed out, the story in question is an aggregation from the Atlanta Journal Constitution. We aggregate content from RSS feeds and through a method called scraping. When we do scrape, we rely on the timestamp of the source article. Sometimes the source article does not include a timezone and by default, our systems assumes and applies a GMT timezone; In this case it resulted in timestamping the aggregated post on our site to the day before the tragedy even took place.
It's a flaw in the system that we are working to correct.
The Orlando shooting was not the first time Superstation95 used a major tragedy to sow additional fear and confusion (which then turn into lucrative pageviews for the site's owner). Superstation95 is a web site that is neither a "superstation" nor a legitimate news source, but rather a dumping grounds of misinformation from Hal Turner, a white supremacist who spent 33 months in prison for making death threats against three federal judges in 2009. (The name listed on the site's "Contact" page is Turner's lawyer.)
Beginning in late 2015, Superstation95 began spreading alarmist hoaxes and conspiracy theories on social media, often building upon legitimate tragic or frightening events with embellished (and frightening) details. Among the most widely spread were claims that a large group of Muslim men fired upon campers and hikers in California, Fukushima radiation caused severe mutations in marine life, cargo ships mysteriously ground to a halt signaling imminent economic catastrophe, a deadly Las Vegas strip car crash involved a driver shouting "Allahu Akbar," the San Bernardino shooting occurred because the shooter was offended by pork served at a holiday party shortly before the massacre, the Earth's "magnetosphere" collapsed for two hours, and a (nonexistent) suicide note left by a genuinely deceased ICE agent warned of impending FEMA camps and mass enslavement. None of Superstation95's tragedy-milking predictions have ever come to fruition. 

By: snopes.com

Relax! Brexit isn’t the end of new world order

 There's no denying it: this past week's vote in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union is very big news. It reveals huge frustration among British voters with economic globalization, immigration, national self-identity and the whole "European project." And there will be costs. Trade between Britain and continental Europe could be notched back a bit as tariffs return; London's role as a financial capital of the world may be compromised somewhat.

But after acknowledging such real, if finite, concerns, we should take a deep breath and relax. Silly headlines like that appearing in the June 25 NY Times about a looming end to the post-World War II order are not only premature, they are basically wrong.

Start with that order. The United States and United Kingdom worked together to win World War II, of course, without the UK being part of any European Union or even a European Community. (The European Community or EC was organized for European economic cooperation that began in the 1970s; it did not create open borders within Europe the way the European Union later did.) Indeed, we collectively won the Cold War without the European Union, which was not created until 1993. Western Europe had already re-established itself as a modern economic powerhouse before the creation of the EU, recovering spectacularly from the unbelievable wartime devastation that occurred in the 1940s. The United States helped a great deal with that process through the Marshall Plan and other mechanisms—none of which depended on EU bureaucracies or open borders.

Look at it another way. The UK is an important country. But with 1% of world population and 3% of world GDP, it does not drive the modern global economy. The stakes here are real, but again, they are finite.

Moreover, the tanking of shocked stock markets right after the Brexit vote should not confuse us about the state of economic fundamentals. To be sure, lots of people will have to work hard to negotiate new terms for Britain's future association with Europe. But the UK and the European Union's remaining 27 members will have powerful incentives to keep trade relatively free and financial markets quite integrated. Think of the models of Norway and Switzerland—also not EU members, but important and interlocking parts of the continent's economy. The UK is likely to wind up with a similar role in Europe's future.

Some people will worry about whether Brexit will weaken the EU's ability to stand up to Vladimir Putin as he causes unrest in eastern Europe. That is doubtful. The EU just last week renewed sanctions, with Germany and other continental countries leading the way. Britain's voice on such matters is important, but no more so than Germany's or France's, and it can remain important on the outside.

What about the US-UK "special relationship?" Again, I do not anticipate major problems. It is called a special relationship for a reason. We have been close allies for a century or more, and much of our best work together has happened bilaterally rather than through any EU, EC, UN, or other such multilateral mechanisms. That can continue.

The UK will remain in NATO, moreover — and NATO is, by far, the more important organization for global security, because it includes the United States while the European Union naturally does not. It is NATO, for example, that intervened in the Balkans wars in the 1990s and NATO that leads the Afghanistan mission even today. It is NATO that is sending battalions into eastern Europe today to stand up militarily to Putin.

On other issues, Britain has maintained its own prerogatives even while in the EU. In the Iran nuclear talks that led to last year's accord, for example, Britain had its own, independent role and voice. That won't change for similar situations in the future.

Even if, in coming years, Scotland secedes from the UK in order to rejoin the EU, that will cost the United Kingdom only 8% of its population (even if a higher percent of its castles, Loch Ness monsters, and men in skirts). Admittedly, the UK's ability to sustain nuclear forces could be challenged without access to Scottish ports—but those nuclear weapons, with all due respect to British friends, aren't really crucial pillars of today's global order in any event. Maybe Scottish secession would even persuade Britain to stop maintaining an unnecessary and costly nuclear deterrent.

To be sure, one can always find some hypothetical scenario in which having the UK outside of the European Union complicates life. To be sure, pulling out will make life temporarily harder for British and European diplomats and bureaucrats as they fashion a revised European order. And most of all, it is true that we need to take seriously the skepticism about globalization that UK voters have just voiced in a powerful and emphatic way. But the postwar global order is hardly falling apart.

 By: usatoday.com

Orlando Florida Gay Nightclub False Reality Shooting

The brief mainstream media (whore)report (linked below) knows how many “dead” and how many “hospitalized.” But it doesn’t tell when the (supposed) shooting occurred.
[From the “git-go” the initial object of the event is to emotionally impact the gullible (“sheeple”) public]
Rather, the particular news blatantly displays a law enforcement helmet with a hole in it. This author thought that particular evidence, to a real crime, would not be subject to cavalier public displays – especially when the alleged crime took place less than 24 hours ago. As the coming days unfold, you can be sure that more anomalies and inconsistencies about this false reality event will become transparent.
Furthermore the “father” of the alleged “shooting” villain has already publicly apologized. That reported facet (“over-kill”) is a “dead” give-a-way as to this alleged violence event being contrived (pre-planned). Real grief does not impact survivors to immediately go public for photo-op displays. Crisis actor (fake) “grief,” does.
Note also, the past Moralmatters commentary of “telltale signs” of false reality (propaganda) events:
Telltale Signs Of Government Contrived Events -moralmatters.org
Make no mistake, the propaganda hounds of corrupt government are again scripting another false reality. They look forward to the anticipated day that Americans will welcome gun confiscation and click their heels to the powers that be. In the meantime there are perpetrated more government contrived (false reality) events to further force fear into the populace and to make that same public, “putty” in their malevolent molding hands.
Oh, don’t forget to glue your ass to your favorite big screen TV chair. And while you are at it, strap that damnable remote to your hand. But don’t forget to leave the other hand free to devour movie microwave popcorn. Get your money’s worth  as you watch the media whores report the latest scripted tabloid event.

Editor’s Note:

 

You will witness much more of the massive mainstream media (whore) coverage of this Orlando false reality event. The perpetrators now have a propaganda / violence event which reportedly rivals and has surpassed the number of alleged victims compared to the Sandy Hook, hoax event. (That, contrived event has been thoroughly exposed). Look for the usual crisis actors, the photo-op pics of grief, etc.
Already this morning while listening to a Christian online worship service, the Christian minister did not question the latest mainstream media whoredom news about the alleged Orlando gay nightclub “massacre.” He readily clicked his heels and prayed for the (supposed) “injured” and (supposed) “survivors.”
Isn’t it amazing how these government contrived events stir people’s emotions and influence them to react as the “powers that be” desire them to respond? Wouldn’t it be gratifying if more people and people leaders would recognize and pray for an awakening among the “sheeple” populace and relate that we live in a decadent culture which has been and continues to be undermined by the depravity of human nature?

Related to the above – some links added (5/13/16)  the day following, of the above commentary. Note also multiple links in the comment section:



Also related to the above:

_____________________________
“A thinking person will question what he hears; examine what he sees; and evaluate what others would have him believe.”
“When did big government and its mainstream media tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”

 By: http://moralmatters.org/ 




Will Biometric Passports Lead to a State of Constant Surveillance? - August 28, 2009

One of life’s sweet pleasures is to travel. Thanks to the increasing number of low-cost flights, traveling abroad is no longer a luxury reserved for the privileged few. At the same time, however, there is an alarming increase in the demand of personal data from tourists and no clear transatlantic legal framework on personal data exchange. Though third parties such as airlines and airport operators have the right to read this data, we don’t know what happens with it afterwards.

Under legislation introduced after the September 11th attacks, the United States has tightened security measures for foreign tourists entering its country. The latest measure requires that by 2012, every traveler entering the United States who is part of the visa-waiver program must have a biometric passport or be forced to apply for a visa.

The biometric passport – which contains an embedded chip with personal data, facial images and fingerprints – is on its way to becoming a global travel prerequisite. Current passports will remain valid for travel to most countries until then. Germany, France and the Netherlands have already started issuing the new documents. EU parliamentarians approved the US’ demand and passed a ruling at the end of 2005 saying that its goal is to combat illegal immigration, terrorism and organized crime. But the excuse that the new passports will help prevent international terrorism is questionable since security agents will need to know whose face or fingerprints they are looking for in the first place.

Initially, Washington gave a 2006 deadline for the 27 countries in the EU and other visa-waiver countries such as Norway, Iceland and Switzerland, but then pushed the date back to June of this year to give these countries more time to prepare the technology needed to issue the biometric passports. The US State Department started introducing e-passports in 2006 and every passport holder in the US is projected to have one by 2017.

In the meantime, there is little enthusiasm for these new requirements. Data watchdogs and human rights activists argue that this regulation treats everyone as a potential criminal, thus violating the protection of citizens’ personal data and imposing a state of constant surveillance.

Peter Hustinx, the European Data Protection Supervisor, said in a press conference on the implementation of biometric passports in 2007 that security measures aimed at preventing terrorism are often stepped up at the expense of privacy. Hustinx is in charge of giving governments and EU bodies advice on data security standards and acts independently of EU institutions. He warned that the EU was “rushing in a new era” of using biometric identifiers for security checks while standards for data protection were still not clear.

“It is very important that the biometric data is only saved in the passport and not in external databanks. Until now there are no international regulations which guarantee this,” said Peter Schaar, German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection, at a conference on data protection held in March of this year in Berlin.

In 2005 when this ruling was issued, no intense political debate occurred in Germany but there were some voices of dissent. The left-wing daily newspaper Die Tageszeitung published a column saying that since 9/11 domestic security had gained more importance than the protection of fundamental citizen rights. In addition, security experts have warned of the danger and ease with which hackers and state agencies could abuse the data registers and the sensitive personal information they track.

In fact, the e-pass, which is supposed to protect states against terrorist attacks, is not so safe at all. In 2006 at the Black Hat security conference held in Las Vegas, Lukas Grunwald, a German computer security consultant, proved that the data in the chips is easy to copy. He demonstrated that a terrorist could carry a passport with his/her real name and photo printed on the pages, but with a chip that contains different information cloned from someone else’s passport. However, this could be easily avoided if the security official examines the pass to make sure the name and the picture printed on it match the data read from the chip.

Further troubling to activists and watchdogs, the European Union is about to enter talks with the US on giving it access to banking data. The plan could go beyond an existing deal with the EU that allows trans-Atlantic airlines to transfer credit card, email addresses, passport, travel itineraries and other data belonging to European passengers to US officials. The US has already been examining transactions handled by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Transactions (SWIFT) since 9/11. SWIFT, which is headquartered in Belgium, is planning to move its servers and database from the US to Europe. With data privacy laws far stricter in Europe, the US would then need permission from the EU before it could gain access to this sensitive information.

The protection of a citizen’s privacy and personal data is vital for any democratic society, and should be respected as much as freedom of expression or movement. Some officials in the US and the EU would do well to re-read Article 8 of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights which states the following:

“Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her. Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law. […] Compliance with these rules shall be subject to control by an independent authority.”

In the paranoid quest for more security, freedom and privacy are often sacrificed. We are all being watched by “Big Brother,” but who is watching “Big Brother” for us?
 Orlando Shooting False flag? Media covers up two shooters!

Titled video & links below are from TyrannyUnmasked YouTube Video

1. Orlando shooter's employer G4S: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/wo...
 
2. Timeline of Orlando nightclub shooting: http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/12/us/orla...

3. The actor interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X75iF...

4. Two shooters Interview: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/videos/n...

5. Abc cuts off Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKBeh...

6. Shooter Legally Purchased Weapons: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/orla...

7.1934 ban on Automatic weapons: https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulat...

8. Please do something about these "Assault Weapons": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiBxr...

9. Marco Rubio on the shooting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMrU_...

10. Hillary Clinton Weapons of war have no place on our streets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0aiC...

11. Obama Presser on Pulse Nightclub Terrorist Attack in Orlando Florida: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTax8...

12. Omar and the Jewish holiday: http://yehweh.org/profiles/blogs/mean...

13 Freedom Fighter Times video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6JQt...

14. LA gay pride parade: man detained with arsenal of weapons before event :http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/20...



By: www.liveleak.com/


Also:

Orlando Shooting False Flag Planned by the UN/Bilderberg ??


 Matafuchs found some compelling evidence of a private security companies connection,G4S to several mass shootings, including Orlando. 

Over and over. I started to look at a few ties that could let someone or some entity have total access to allow certain events to occur. The best thing you can have to plan is HUMINT. I started to look where they are. I started with the latest terror shooting. 

They are there...and do private security for government buildings. 

They are responsible for security at NASA. 

Washington Naval Yard. They, G4S provide private security. 

The Orlando shooter. He worked for G4S. 

Last one...where else does G4S have security? 

Ft Hood......


There was a relatively unnoticed meeting at the UN from June 6-10 which focused on aglobal gun control agenda. 

In 2011, G4S became a signatory to the UN Global Compact,


The Bilderberg group started to convene on June 9-12 

It is my belief that some members left the UN meeting on disarmament and went to Bilderberg meeting with some ideas on how to further brainwash people using their emotion to react to a situation and argue for diminishing personal liberties. I believe someone, or a group of people came to the decision in private to initiate the false flag, and it just so happened on the last day they are meeting. 

This was a hit ordered by Bilderberg utilizing an agent of a UN affiliated agency to hit a target that is currently a socially sensitive demographic to the American population due to heavy media exposure over unrelated issues. 

By: abovetopsecret.com




Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)